A federal appeals court has upheld a controversial verdict that an Arizona rancher must pay $87,000 to four illegal immigrants he detained at gunpoint while they crossed his property.
The ruling Thursday from a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco found that the 2009 civil judgment against rancher Roger Barnett was proper and that the jury should not have been instructed that they could find Barnett acted in self-defense.
Maybe our government should pay head to what is going on in the Middle East as it relates to the way they are running our country. Stories like the above are becoming all too common and getting worse. This rancher has been found guilty of violating the civil rights of illegals! Does that even make sense? And why the hell are they trying the case in the most morally bankrupt part of the country? With what is going on in the Mexican border towns and all the government can do is persecute a rancher trying to protect his property? So if I decide to take a short cut through one of these idiot federal judges homes and they catch me and turn me over to the police, can I file a suit and expect a payday? Instead of making San Francisco a sanctuary city, lets make these federal judges homes, sanctuary houses and let the illegals squat on their property. I wonder how that would fly.
Oh, and lets not leave Nancy Pelosi out of this plan. I’m sure she has a few extra rooms in her mansion.
By the way, who in the hell designed most of our border fences that come with built-in ladders?
I could design a better fence than this, hell Ray Charles could!
No comments:
Post a Comment